- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let's revisit Breaux's fair/foul ball in the 9th
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:17 am
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:17 am
It is obviously foul in the first clip, and obviously fair in the second. I just don't see how you overturn that AND award him a double if you called it foul on the field. The umpire is in perfect position. Plus, in the second clip, if that ball was fair, how did it end up landing so far foul in so little time and with so little right to left movement?
And for those of you who don't know, the position of Breaux's body is irrelevant.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:19 am to slackster
I saw it live, looked so foul, then saw replay, looked fair. I can see how it was overturned. We are all human.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:19 am to slackster
Camera angle needs to be directly down the foul line. The announcers said last night that the umps would have the same exact camera angles that we were shown on TV
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:20 am to slackster
Really should have been caught. No replay needed.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:20 am to slackster
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/16 at 9:53 am
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:23 am to slackster
I mean if you look at the second part of the gif and basically draw a line down from where he touches the ball you can see that his right foot lands damn near in the same vertical line. If anything, his right foot looks short of that vertical line, which would put the ball about a foot foul.
The ball obviously needs to be caught, but how the hell do you overturn it with this kind of shite.
The ball obviously needs to be caught, but how the hell do you overturn it with this kind of shite.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:23 am to slackster
Football has the camera exactly down the endzone line. Baseball needs the same with foul line...
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:24 am to slackster
If you could stop the tape, look where his feet are when he touches the ball you could get a better idea of where the ball is.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:25 am to slackster
I'm not saying it was obviously foul in the first clip, but you're right when the blue on the 3rd base line had the best shot of it. I didn't think it was clear enough to overturn, but once they did I wasn't upset. LSU got a break when Fraley was called safe. It evened out.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:26 am to slackster
Umps don't understand angles and the visual deception it creates. No way to tell when camera isn't down the line.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:29 am to slackster
it was clearly fair in both clips, you can tell from where his body and glove are that he is in fair territory. Despite them awarding him 2nd base, we likely caught a break cause Reed probably would have been on 3rd had the call been right from the onset.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:37 am to slackster
Let's just call it a make-up call, since the tying run was obviously out at the plate...
None of y'all griping 'bout THAT call, though.
None of y'all griping 'bout THAT call, though.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:41 am to slackster
he left the ground and landed in foul territory and the ball was clearly foul.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:42 am to slackster
The ball was in fair territory when it touched Breaux' glove. Doesn't matter where it might have landed or what happened after it touched the glove.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 9:51 am to slackster
There was a third angle which they only showed for a second on tv, and it was from the left field camera behind the play. From that angle it looked foul for sure. The problem with the overrule is that in all three camera angles it is clear that the umpire in perfect position, paying attention, looking down the line directly at the play to make that call. The camera angles were not nearly as good as the umpire's view. I can't tell conclusively, so it should have been the umpire's call.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:08 am to slackster
Shouldn't have been awarded a double
Agree with overturning it as it was a fair ball but give the man 1st base and move on
Agree with overturning it as it was a fair ball but give the man 1st base and move on
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:10 am to slackster
Easily a fair ball. Good overturn.
Posted on 5/26/16 at 10:47 am to slackster
Disregard
This post was edited on 5/26/16 at 10:50 am
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:29 am to slackster
It looks like it's inconclusive so I am still surprised they ruled definitively on such a play that was originally called foul
I just can't see how you can say for sure which way it truly lands.
I just can't see how you can say for sure which way it truly lands.
This post was edited on 5/26/16 at 11:31 am
Posted on 5/26/16 at 11:58 am to slackster
quote:
I just don't see how you overturn that AND award him a double if you called it foul on the field. The umpire is in perfect position.
And for those of you who don't know, the position of Breaux's body is irrelevant.
Sometimes replays work, and sometimes they don't.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News