Started By
Message

re: Tim Duncan top 10 all-time?

Posted on 5/12/16 at 10:20 pm to
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

With these ticky tact bullshite no contact rules... He would average 40+ a game. Jesus the people who have no idea about the history of the game..


Just stop. The athletes are bigger and better, the game is faster, and there is more parity among teams across the board.

Wilt would be a force, but not nearly head and shoulders the best player on the planet night in and night out like back in the day.
Posted by Kneehigh
Low Country
Member since Nov 2012
13320 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 10:22 pm to
Jesus fricking Christ the people on this board... Seek fricking help...
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13748 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 10:26 pm to
Wilt from what I've read could've been an Olympic hurdler and was fast too. IMO he would've been a DAJ superstar form. Probably 18/14 a game. It's just impossible to average 20/10 in the NBA today without being able to score outside the paint or have a potent post game. I guess Wilt would be a better D12 now that I think about it. Still nowhere near 50/25 or whatever.
Posted by Kneehigh
Low Country
Member since Nov 2012
13320 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 10:27 pm to
Yeah... Russel, Thurmmond, Petit, Cunningham, Bellamy.... yada yada yada... all fricking scrubs... Again... STFU... you have no idea wtf you're talking about...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram