Started By
Message

re: AR in 204 ruger or 300AAC?

Posted on 4/27/16 at 2:51 pm to
Posted by Huntinguy
Member since Mar 2011
1754 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 2:51 pm to

My vote would be 300blk

quote:

.204 is a high velocity round and I think that would work against your suppression intention, quite a bit.


He's right, the .204 is a speedster, why go to the trouble of slowing it to subsonic?, just run subs through your 15-22.
.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66467 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

He's right, the .204 is a speedster, why go to the trouble of slowing it to subsonic?


I don't think it's even possible. The most pedestrian 204 factory loads are still cruising at a cool 3900fps
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38908 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 3:15 pm to
quote:


He's right, the .204 is a speedster, why go to the trouble of slowing it to subsonic?, just run subs through your 15-22


if i got the 204 thats what i would do
just trying to weigh the fun of blasting rats with the 204 vs the fun of shooting 300AAC subs thru the can

i may just get a 204 ruger american for that though, cheap and easy
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram