- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How not to sight fish....
Posted on 4/28/16 at 6:49 am to Barf
Posted on 4/28/16 at 6:49 am to Barf
quote:
your legal limit always the objective?
Pretty sure that is his objective.
What I find interesting is that it seems he has himself convinced that he can always catch more fish blind casting versus a skilled sight fisherman no matter what. Maybe I'm reading that wrong, but it seems that's his stance.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 8:39 am to Dock Holiday
quote:
What I find interesting is that it seems he has himself convinced that he can always catch more fish blind casting versus a skilled sight fisherman no matter what. Maybe I'm reading that wrong, but it seems that's his stance.
Yeah It's hard to tell. Either way it's apples and oranges. I don't think I've ever heard of, or seen a poling skiff hauling in redfish hand over fist. However, I've seen and been on boats that anchored next to a drain and sat there and caught dozens of redfish, maybe even over 100. I guess that could be considered blind casting.
As a general rule, if you can see the redfish, the redfish can see you. Poling around in shallow water is not a high yield game like drowning bait under a cork. Numbers wise, I'd be willing to bet someone who fishes bait will pull in more fish.
I would rather spot, stalk, and land 5 fish in an 8 hour day than sit in one spot and catch 100 with bait.
It's not really fair to compare to the two philosophies.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News