- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where do the Warriors fit historically if they win the title this year
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:53 pm to 13SaintTiger
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:53 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
Detroit has been relevant for the past 30 years
detroit was relevant in the late 80s and the mid 2000s. you know how many winning seasons they had between 1991 and 2001? 3. you know how many winning seasons theyve had since 2009? 1, this year
detroit was relevant between 1985 and 1990 and 2001 and 2009 but outside of that has been pretty fricking shitty as a franchise. its hilarious that you think they are this clear cut better franchise even given you opinion on the warriors
1
Posted on 4/15/16 at 10:27 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
detroit was relevant in the late 80s and the mid 2000s. you know how many winning seasons they had between 1991 and 2001? 3. you know how many winning seasons theyve had since 2009? 1, this year detroit was relevant between 1985 and 1990 and 2001 and 2009 but outside of that has been pretty fricking shitty as a franchise. its hilarious that you think they are this clear cut better franchise even given you opinion on the warriors
If we're using this argument, then the Blazers or heaven forbid, the Rockets are top 5 material. If we're objectively speaking and not being prisoners of the moment, both teams have been relevant for a long time. The Rockets have 2 titles. The Blazers have one and a few appearences.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News