re: Butch Jones calls player who helped a rape victim "a traitor" in front of team

quote:

---

20% of text excluded the primary suspect, so you attribute that to false allegations?

---

You aren't very bright are you? Of course I attribute it to false allegations. And why? Because I know what the words "false" and "allegation" mean. You apparently do not. How do you think the guy became the primary suspect, assfact?


Moreover, you apparently don't quite understand this study, or you don't appreciate it that the mere "primary suspect" had been sitting prison for 20 years. You know, de minimus stuff.

Here read the paper. Maybe it will help you be less stupid going forward. file:///Volumes/NO%20NAME/dnaevid.pdf

quote:

---

know this may be news to you, but not every victim knows who raped them.

---

You don't know what the word victim means. A girl that didn't get raped ain't a victim, stud.

quote:

---

now this may be news to you, but not every victim knows who raped themThe fact that DNA excludes the primary suspect =/= "every other time a bitch claims she got raped, she's just outright lying."

---

Is this your actual argument? Like this was the best you could come up with? Like, really? The old "it must have been the one-armed man who raped me instead" argument was the best option you had?

Yeah, brilliant, buddy. And when I say brilliant, I mean, not a good argument at all. The vast vast majority of actual rapes that occur and that aren't fabricated in imaginations are people that the actual does know. That may be news to you because, as we've established, you aren't particularly bright. Or at least not particularly well informed. Or both.

quote:

---

Even if we concede all of your made-up, pulled out of your arse numbers

---

It doesn't appear that you what "pulled out of your arse" means.

quote:

---

you're still acknowledging the fact that 60-75% (likely much more) of cases are NOT made up. They're legitimate claims that may or may not be proven in court. At worst, the majority of claims by these "bitches" are legitimate, yet you still have the attitude you do

---

The worst part about this, is that you actually believe it's a good argument. Do you know whwt the numbers are for false reports of EVERY OTHER CRIME KNOWN TO MAN? Yeah, it's negligible, homeboy. Just imagine if robberies and attempted murders and larcenies were fabricated for reporting purposes at a similar rate. How much of a problem would that be?

Oh, what's that? A major major focking problem, you say? Well, yes, and I agree with your sentiments. The fact that any individual with the ability to formulate thoughts would brush aside the massive frequency of full-blown fabrications on the sexual assault front is completely puzzling to me, and just alarmingly stupid and naive on every conceivable level.

Do rapes happen? Sure.
To prevent rapes from happening, is the appropriate course of action to do everything short of expressly outright encouraging the incarceration of innocent men -- or in the Title IX cases, where it often amounts to full blown encouragement -- or getting them expelled from college? Is due process and the presumption of innocent a mere unavoidable ancillary effect in the much more lofty goal of ending sexual assaults?

I can't stress enough how aggressively dangerous your above-quoted paragraph is. It diarrhea shits in the face of the american criminal justice system. Oliver Wendell Holmes just rolled over in his grade and flipped you the bird.

"tis better that 10 guilty men go free than for one innocent man to be convicted......unless we're talking about sexual assualt, in which case frick that noise...20 years in jail isn't near the societal wrong that a sexual assault is."

And the scary part is that you actually believe it. You are a very stupid man, and a very bad American.