- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Surprise Surprise - FBI wants Apple to unlock additional phones
Posted on 2/24/16 at 6:50 am to jbgleason
Posted on 2/24/16 at 6:50 am to jbgleason
Not your best post.
A. As is pointed out, the NSA is already applying algorithms to all communications.
B. Read the Preamble to the US Constitution: The goal of establishing our government Is to "insure domestic tranquility" "promote the general welfare" and "provide for the common defense". That means having the capacity to effect surveillance. And sometimes this means erring on the side of infringement on personal liberty or freedoms. We have enough lawyers in our society to eventually remediate any errors.
C. I'll take the present excesses of our government versus not having them watching over the situation. I get that we could become more like a police state. If forced to take an extreme from the two choices, I'd rather that than anarchy.
A. As is pointed out, the NSA is already applying algorithms to all communications.
B. Read the Preamble to the US Constitution: The goal of establishing our government Is to "insure domestic tranquility" "promote the general welfare" and "provide for the common defense". That means having the capacity to effect surveillance. And sometimes this means erring on the side of infringement on personal liberty or freedoms. We have enough lawyers in our society to eventually remediate any errors.
C. I'll take the present excesses of our government versus not having them watching over the situation. I get that we could become more like a police state. If forced to take an extreme from the two choices, I'd rather that than anarchy.
9
Posted on 2/24/16 at 7:03 am to soccerfüt
Who cares? Government wants to view the phones of criminals and terrorists. Phones they have possession of already. Go for it IMO.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 7:51 am to soccerfüt
Gee. I didn't have you pegged as a fascist.
There is a famous quote about the man that trades Liberty for Security ending up with neither. You should check that out. BTW. I am pretty far right politically but having been on the inside of the GOV I can tell you that it's power needs to be monitored and controlled lest the "public servants" run amok.
There is a famous quote about the man that trades Liberty for Security ending up with neither. You should check that out. BTW. I am pretty far right politically but having been on the inside of the GOV I can tell you that it's power needs to be monitored and controlled lest the "public servants" run amok.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 8:08 am to soccerfüt
quote:
That means having the capacity to effect surveillance. And sometimes this means erring on the side of infringement on personal liberty or freedoms. We have enough lawyers in our society to eventually remediate any errors.
C. I'll take the present excesses of our government versus not having them watching over the situation. I get that we could become more like a police state. If forced to take an extreme from the two choices, I'd rather that than anarchy.
1984
Posted on 2/24/16 at 8:24 am to soccerfüt
quote:The Preamble does not have any legal authority.
Read the Preamble to the US Constitution
Posted on 2/24/16 at 10:22 am to soccerfüt
quote:
If forced to take an extreme from the two choices, I'd rather that than anarchy.
When a government has become as monolithic, degenerate and corrupt as ours has, it is time for a little anarchy. Read some Thomas Jefferson, you bootlicker.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 12:05 pm to soccerfüt
If I was going to quote the constitution, I would quote an enforceable part.
I would also quote the 4th amendment which actually deals with this current issue.
I would also quote the 4th amendment which actually deals with this current issue.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 3:11 pm to soccerfüt
quote:
That means having the capacity to effect surveillance. And sometimes this means erring on the side of infringement on personal liberty or freedoms.
Where does it say that at?
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:25 am to soccerfüt
”Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.”
Posted on 3/1/16 at 2:14 pm to soccerfüt
quote:.
If forced to take an extreme from the two choices, I'd rather that than anarchy.
I bet if push comes to shove, you'd choose a life of slavery to a life of livery as well.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News