Started By
Message

re: Physicists ... what do you think about fifth dimension travel?

Posted on 2/8/16 at 7:30 pm to
Posted by AjaxFury
In & out of The Matrix
Member since Sep 2014
9928 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 7:30 pm to
This will be polarizing to some, but Ephesians 6:12 states this theory well over 1,000 years ago
******
"For our struggle is not against human opponents, but against rulers, authorities, cosmic powers in the darkness around us, and evil spiritual forces in the heavenly realm. "

If you've experienced SP, and have had OBE's on occasion totally sober, then it would make you pause to think they were onto something.

Unfortunately, our technology isn't advanced enough to produce quantifiable data on this topic as far as I know. Still, doesn't mean we should throw out the baby with the bathwater.

The fact that nearly every civilization on earth has documented the sleep paralysis phenomenon dating back over 1000 years should clue is in that there is something more living then just in the physical world that we can observe

ETA: correct me if I'm wrong, but in quantum physics, aren't there particles that behave differently when they are observed? That would make it difficult to produce the physical evidence you are seeking.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 7:35 pm
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 7:34 pm to
This fricking thread
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

he fact that nearly every civilization on earth has documented the sleep paralysis phenomenon dating back over 1000 years should clue is in that there is something more living then just in the physical world that we can observe

I have trouble following this logic. If the most accepted explanation of sleep paralysis is physiological, then it would quite normal for this to occur across populations and generations. So to whatever extent your belief is correct, I'm not sure how that provide any evidence.

quote:

ETA: correct me if I'm wrong, but in quantum physics, aren't there particles that behave differently when they are observed? That would make it difficult to produce the physical evidence you are seeking.
I mean obviously some observable physical evidence would be the most definitive, BUT this is not required to reject the null. For example, so called "psychics" and others purporting paranormal skills have been scientifically studied under controlled conditions (e.g., predict what what card a person is holding). AND these individuals who have made their careers on this paranormal power, have consistently either failed miserably or performed as well as the expected probability (i.e., chance).

So if a "telepathic or psychic " would have been able to correctly guess 100 out of 100 cards in a controlled study, we wouldn't need to see its physical explanation to conclude that there is some validity to the psychic's claim. Yet, they fail to even meet that bar.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 7:59 pm
Posted by retired trucker
midwest
Member since Feb 2015
5093 posts
Posted on 2/9/16 at 7:39 am to
AJAX

as a side bar to Ephesians 6-12

Biblical archeologist, E. Raymond Capt, explained the cover of the chalice well in the UK at Glastonbury, showing two interlocking spheres, as representative of the visible and invisible world that's around us!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram