re: Jerricho Cotchery's catch ruled incomplete after review - explanation?

quote:

---

but he had his hand under the ball and controlled

---

What? The only point of contention to argue it was a catch was whether or not the ball hit the ground. It is indisputable that he did not control the ball as evidenced by the fact he shifted it from one arm to the other and ultimately was pinning it to his body with his right elbow. If the ball doesn't hit the ground, it's a catch and no one argues otherwise.