Started By
Message

re: Jerricho Cotchery's catch ruled incomplete after review - explanation?

Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:51 am to
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:51 am to
No indisputable video evidence to indicate that the tip of the ball did not touch the ground when he first went down. Had they called it a completion on the field, they would not have overturned it either.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10483 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:52 am to
quote:

No indisputable video evidence to indicate that the tip of the ball did not touch the ground when he first went down. Had they called it a completion on the field, they would not have overturned it either.


Honestly I was shocked it was called as stands rather than confirmed. The tip of the ball clearly hit the ground.
Posted by nofear67
Houston
Member since Jan 2006
2285 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:54 am to
quote:

No indisputable video evidence to indicate that the tip of the ball did not touch the ground when he first went down. Had they called it a completion on the field, they would not have overturned it either.

There indeed was footage shown on TV where the ball did not touch the ground.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram