quote:
And I have no problem paying that. It isn't all about cost for me, it's convenience and efficiency. It should be a little cheaper because I'm not always consuming content over the wire, and I don't want to rent technology, but yeah, it can be $100 for Netflix if they had Cable levels of content, and new stuff.

But you're still the exception, IMO. I feel like the trend is people wanting more access for less, to the point of getting it as cheap as possible, and free if at all possible.

And the content holders will never let that happen as long as they have the content and the money to fight it.

And you (and some in here) understand that if cable went away, Netflix wouldn't be $12 a month anymore or whatever, but I really think a lot of people don't get that....because they think they should be able to get access to whatever they want, however they want. For free (or cheap). And that's just not feasible.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Freauxzen

Utah

Member since Feb 2006

37483 posts

Posted on 2/4/16 at 7:53 pm to CocomoLSU

quote:
But you're still the exception, IMO. I feel like the trend is people wanting more access for less, to the point of getting it as cheap as possible, and free if at all possible.

And the content holders will never let that happen as long as they have the content and the money to fight it.

And you (and some in here) understand that if cable went away, Netflix wouldn't be $12 a month anymore or whatever, but I really think a lot of people don't get that....because they think they should be able to get access to whatever they want, however they want. For free (or cheap). And that's just not feasible.

So Step 1 Steal Underpants.
Step 2 Inform the uninformed that content costs money
Step 3
Step 4 - Profit?

1 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board