- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA Times: NFL consensus builds for Rams-Chargers to share stadium in Inglewood
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:11 pm to Dire Wolf
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:11 pm to Dire Wolf
Being the Rams owner is footing more of the stadium bill .. I would say the Chargers. Now what could be interesting is if San Deigo works a deal with the Raiders in a few years. The City of San Deigo has said they were willing to discuss a new stadium but the Chargers stopped talking to them.
1
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:58 pm to coolneal
Mark Davis and the Raiders is the only owner/team that has not burned the bridges back home. The Oakland politicans can't come up with the $$$ for the Coliseum City project or another project for the stadium. Like I said last week, the Rams and Chargers will move to LA and pay $550 million apiece to do so, and share a stadium in Inglewood. The NFL will then use the $1.1 billion from the Rams and Chargers to build the Raiders a stadium in Oakland.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News