Started By
Message

re: LA Times: NFL consensus builds for Rams-Chargers to share stadium in Inglewood

Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:09 pm to
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158786 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:09 pm to
I understand the want to be back in that market but don't understand the need to put 2 teams there.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54209 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:11 pm to
Why put two teams there?

Why not just one?
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61349 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

I understand the want to be back in that market but don't understand the need to put 2 teams there.
Same here. And though this is strictly anecdotal, I haven't met a single person in LA who wants two teams. And frankly I don't think LA will support two teams.
Posted by stlslick
St.Louis,Mo
Member since Nov 2012
14101 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:17 pm to
Basically the NFL is corrupt as it gets.

They will buy off Davis, and the turds of the league(jerrah) have persuaded Spanos to partner with kroenke.

Kroenke is the guy who Spanos called, wanting to talk about maybe doing something in inglewood area a year before Stan buys the land. Spanos finds out several months later after no response back from Kroenke, that Kroenke has purchased the land that Spanos wanted to partner on. And quietly does it, showing how big of a weasel Stan really is.



they must of greased Spanos good, to partner with Kroenke, since the day Stan screwd him over, he has hated the guy.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram