Started By
Message

re: Commish says we are charging from H2H to scoring format.

Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:18 pm to
Posted by LSU4ever2002
Member since Sep 2009
642 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:18 pm to
Scoring + H2H would be the same as H2H.

Standings are based off record, with tiebreaker being who scored the most total points. In the playoffs you would strictly do H2h to determine who advances.

My league this year had a guy make playoffs at 10-3 even though he had 120 less points than someone who missed the playoffs at 8-5. They both would have been 15-11 using the scoring + h2h formats and 8-5 team would have had the tiebreaker and made the playoffs.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16484 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

In the playoffs you would strictly do H2h to determine who advances.


Why not have the top 4/6 make a 2 round playoff. Top 2 scorers make it to the championship for a H2H.

Posted by Keeble9145
Member since Sep 2015
958 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Scoring + H2H would be the same as H2H. Standings are based off record, with tiebreaker being who scored the most total points. In the playoffs you would strictly do H2h to determine who advances. My league this year had a guy make playoffs at 10-3 even though he had 120 less points than someone who missed the playoffs at 8-5. They both would have been 15-11 using the scoring + h2h formats and 8-5 team would have had the tiebreaker and made the playoffs.


You literally just proved yourself wrong

if it was the same then the 8-5 would've made the playoffs and not the 10-3 guy. Did you mean h2h+scoring was the same thing as total points?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram