Started By
Message

re: Texas Tech run defense (by the numbers)

Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:16 pm to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44021 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

And I'm saying that that "relatively" is wrong because we ran the ball 15 times in the first half vs. 32 in the second when LSU pulled away with it


"Relatively" refers to the game, as a whole, where LSU did not meet it's season average against the worst run D in the conference. Hell, they didn't even meet their conference average.

Therefore, relative to the rest of their season, LSU was held in check.
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4740 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Therefore, relative to the rest of their season, LSU was held in check.


Whatever man. We just have different definitions on what being held in check means. I get what you are saying about "relative"... I just disagree with it because the game plan was not to come out and establish the run game early like LSU does in most games.

To you being held in check means running below your season average.

To me it means not running the ball effectively.

We are just going to have to agree to disagree apparently.
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 2:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram