Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 1/3/16 at 7:18 pm to
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25310 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 7:18 pm to
Ppl are unfairly comparing him to Vader. Vader was an all-timer.

I actually like Kylo bc he's one of the few characters with some depth and conflict on the movie. Obviously I hope we can go a bit deeper with some of the players in the next movie.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109962 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Ppl are unfairly comparing him to Vader. Vader was an all-timer.

I actually like Kylo bc he's one of the few characters with some depth and conflict on the movie. Obviously I hope we can go a bit deeper with some of the players in the next movie.


On top of that, Vader is two dimensional in the original film. He only gets depth in Empire. They attempt to give Kylo depth in the first one here, and I think it's very successful. Who knows how far they'll take the character now.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25914 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Ppl are unfairly comparing him to Vader. Vader was an all-timer.


Well to be fair, it was pretty explicit that he was trying to be Vader.


With that said, that's kind of what I liked about him and any weakness you want to throw at him (being emo, light saber fighting). He wasn't supposed to be as good as Vader, he was supposed to be a wild imitation. I dug it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram