- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marksville City Marshals......Breaking two officers charged with murder
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:48 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:48 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
What's more simple is the dad should not get into a pursuit with his child in the car. He should also not try to ram officers chasing him with said child in the car. But you're right, it's the cops' fault.
The dad was wrong for his actions and should be held accountable. The cops were wrong for blindly firing into a car when they had no idea who was in there. They should be held accountable for the child's death. When a cop(or anyone else for that matter) draws a weapon and starts firing, they take responsibility for the consequences of what happens. Bottom line is these cops did not aquire a proper sight picture and instead went Wild West with their pistols. This resulted in the senseless death of a child. There is no excusing their actions.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:53 am to Darth_Vader
If officers don't have to worry about taking innocent lives when they discharge their weapons then we are living in the Wild fricking West.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 3:44 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
When a cop(or anyone else for that matter) draws a weapon and starts firing, they take responsibility for the consequences of what happens. Bottom line is these cops did not aquire a proper sight picture and instead went Wild West with their pistols.
Let me help you here. A police officer may fire his/her weapon when that officer determines that someone has put his/her life is in danger. As a police officer or any other citizen, you can defend yourself through any means possible if you can articulate that you were likely to suffer severe bodily harm if you didn't stop the threat.
If the driver was ramming the police car, the officer(s) were likely under attack by a deadly weapon. Not all the facts are public but the officers will be judged by the reasonable person test. In other words, would the reasonable person have acted in similar fashion to protect life?
You state that officers must take responsibility for their actions for each bullet fired. This is true. However, if that vehicle did ram the police car, the officers didn't create the deadly force situation. If police are only allowed to defend themselves or others when they are 100% sure to hit their targets, there will be a shite ton more crime and violence on our streets than there already is. Maybe you've watched too many action movies but the odds of striking a moving target at more than 3-5 feet is extremely low. That doesn't change the fact that if you are at risk to die or become disabled, you're allowed to defend yourself as needed.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)