- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "they look like they just came from the fields" - racist?
Posted on 11/3/15 at 12:49 pm to TDsngumbo
Posted on 11/3/15 at 12:49 pm to TDsngumbo
Why do people think that only slaves picked cotton? It's patently false.
Poor people picked cotton. And there were plenty of poor whites in the south. Hell, I can think of about 5 country songs that directly reference poor whites picking cotton. It's not a racial thing.
Poor people picked cotton. And there were plenty of poor whites in the south. Hell, I can think of about 5 country songs that directly reference poor whites picking cotton. It's not a racial thing.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 12:52 pm to fr33manator
My grandfather used to tell me how he picked cotton in MS for $0.05/pound
Posted on 11/3/15 at 1:24 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Why do people think that only slaves picked cotton? It's patently false.
There has been a lot of cotton picked since 1865 - and it was done by a lot of poor people, black and white. "Sharecroppers" I think they were called, until machines largely replaced them.
People forget how manpower intensive it was - a good cotton picking machine wasn't widely used until the Depression.
Ironically, a machine (the Whitney Gin) made the very labor-intensive act of cotton farming economically feasible in the 19th century. But a machine didn't free man from the labor until over 100 years later (thus, slavery was continued to feed those gins.)
Which is another reason why I bristle at Southern white folks in the 21st century have to bear all the negative stigma of slavery. EVERYBODY was using American cotton in the first half of the 19th century - Europe (particularly England) and the Yankees - their linen mills absolutely required the cotton that slaves were producing in the Cotton Belt. Everyone benefitted from it and the slaveowners were a convenient and visible scapegoat - who obviously deserved their portion of the fault and, collectively, were responsible for the direct abuses of that peculiar institution.
But, they weren't alone - they weren't holding slaves and producing cotton for their own amusement, that's for certain.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News