- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matthew Berry and the 'fantasy football snob trade argument'
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:55 pm to ehidal1
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:55 pm to ehidal1
I vetoed my first trade ever the other day. Not bc it was unfair or collusion was involved, it was because they vetoed my fair trade last year cause my team would have been too good. Yes, I was still bitter
1
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:22 pm to bleedpurplengold
Thus the slippery slope...
I agree with you. If you side on the 'unfair' veto argument, then you can't complain about trade vetoes that others deem unfair. You open the box, then it's open. Collusion only and that subjective grey area is out of the equation.
I agree with you. If you side on the 'unfair' veto argument, then you can't complain about trade vetoes that others deem unfair. You open the box, then it's open. Collusion only and that subjective grey area is out of the equation.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News