Started By
Message

re: Another BR Pitbull Attack

Posted on 9/9/15 at 11:13 am to
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6781 posts
Posted on 9/9/15 at 11:13 am to
quote:

, it is kind of screwy that they ruled the dog "dangerous" and the owners did all the required actions only to have Animal Control change their minds and come back to say they now want to kill the dog.

All the neighbors petitioned for it because they don't want the dog to attack them again.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18935 posts
Posted on 9/9/15 at 11:27 am to
I was more commenting on the fact that Animal Control only went with Dangerous the first time. If they had 19 reports it seems like they would have gone straight to vicious. I never like when the government decides something and then changes its mind and comes back over the top. If they rule and you fulfill the requirements then it seems like they are obligated, absent changing circumstances, to abide by their ruling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram