Started By
Message

re: Go figure...

Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:39 am to
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16465 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:39 am to
And the judge was correct in doing so. The CBA clearly states that the punishment for tampering with the ball is a fine. There is no suspension tied to this. Furthermore, there is no proof that Brady stated the balls should be underinflated or tampered with after the refs checked them.

And, in regards to the not cooperating with the cell phone, the league did not differentiate that in any the documents that have been made public(I.e., 2 games for tampering, 2 games for not cooperating); so there was nothing for the judge to uphold the suspension for.

The argument/anger should not be directed towards Brady. It really needs to be at the league & RG for going soft on the team and the Coaching staff. This is where the comparison should be made towards the Saints w/ the alleged bounties. Our team & coaches were punished for not having control of the situation and that they should have had an institutional knowledge of the things that take place within their team.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram