- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Today's Advocate headline, "I-10 widening garners little enthusiasm"
Posted on 8/31/15 at 1:12 pm to Adam4848
Posted on 8/31/15 at 1:12 pm to Adam4848
quote:
The issue has never been the engineering
The engineering was terrible. The downramp from the bridge narrowing to one lane, terrible.
Having the main artery (I-10) with fewer lane than the spur(I110) was terrible.
The bridge entrance ramp from the East side heading west was designed wrong causing trucks major problems.
No East bound entrance ramp on Dalrymple was poor planning.
No shoulders on the old portions of the interstate was poor engineering.
building the interstate bisecting the Lakes, and downtown BR was poor planning.
1
Posted on 8/31/15 at 4:21 pm to doubleb
quote:
The engineering was terrible. The downramp from the bridge narrowing to one lane, terrible. Having the main artery (I-10) with fewer lane than the spur(I110) was terrible. The bridge entrance ramp from the East side heading west was designed wrong causing trucks major problems. No East bound entrance ramp on Dalrymple was poor planning. No shoulders on the old portions of the interstate was poor engineering. building the interstate bisecting the Lakes, and downtown BR was poor planning.
You realize I was talking about the expansion/loop drawings?
This post was edited on 8/31/15 at 4:22 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News