- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Today's Advocate headline, "I-10 widening garners little enthusiasm"
Posted on 8/31/15 at 11:38 am to TigerRob20
Posted on 8/31/15 at 11:38 am to TigerRob20
quote:
If they built new lanes for 10 East, don't you think they would reconfigure the bridge lanes to have all 3 lanes available for eastbound traffic, instead of 1 for NB 110, 1 for EB 10 and 1 for Washington Street?
I think widening would need to begin at the Nicholson/Highland exit. You then would have 4 lanes coming off the bridge with 1 going northbound I-110 and the other 3 going eastbound.
You hold those 3 lanes all the way out to the 10/12 split.. so 2 lanes of widening beginning at Washington street. This would mean that the interstate would be 5 lanes wide in the eastbound direction from the I-110 southbound merge to the 10/12 split.
I know. Easier said than done.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News