Started By
Message

re: Premier League Kit Deals, club by club

Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45088 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Not really. Nike became king and has remained king here.

I was listening to Sonny Vacarro (legendary shoe executive, had 30 for 30 about him) a few weeks ago and he was talking about how if it were not for some of their soccer deals Adidas would be dead in the water. They are basically dead here in the states.


Exactly. Nike 100% has a monopoly here in the US. They sponsor the best athletes and will soon have the rights to two of the big three sports in the USA.

Adidas would be completely under if they weren't a big soccer company in Europe. They're just as popular of a brand as Nike everywhere but here in the U.S.

ETA: I'm pretty sure Jordan brand by itself makes more money in a year than Adidas does.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 2:26 pm
Posted by WhoDatNC
NC
Member since Dec 2013
11755 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:30 pm to
Bring back Umbro.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

ETA: I'm pretty sure Jordan brand by itself makes more money in a year than Adidas does.


Are you talking worldwide?

Jordan made $2.6B in 2014. LINK

Adidas made €14.534B in 2014. LINK
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 2:40 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125480 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Exactly. Nike 100% has a monopoly here in the US. They sponsor the best athletes and will soon have the rights to two of the big three sports in the USA.

Adidas would be completely under if they weren't a big soccer company in Europe. They're just as popular of a brand as Nike everywhere but here in the U.S.

ETA: I'm pretty sure Jordan brand by itself makes more money in a year than Adidas does.


this shite again

Nike and Adidas revenue last time they were posted were almost the exact same
Posted by Dijkstra
Michael J. Fox's location in time.
Member since Sep 2007
8738 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Exactly. Nike 100% has a monopoly here in the US. They sponsor the best athletes and will soon have the rights to two of the big three sports in the USA.

Adidas would be completely under if they weren't a big soccer company in Europe. They're just as popular of a brand as Nike everywhere but here in the U.S.


Well, you're right and wrong at the same time in my opinion. Nike is huge here, but they're huge because they've always focused on sponsoring athletes first and foremost. It's like Twitter and Beats By Dre. They knew that people want to be like celebrities so get them using the products, and people will follow. Now, they want to get leagues under their brand, and they're sacrificing individual entity as sponsors more to do so.

Adidas is starting to do the opposite. They're focusing REALLY heavily on locking up individual superstars and entities like United to get people associating them with these beloved individuals. They're about to pay Harden an insane amount to jump ship from Nike. They've already committed to what is an absurd amount of money with United. With the right moves with this tactic and the rise of the sport here, Adidas will see a big boost in popularity. They just need to be more proactive with getting themselves visible during "the moment". When you see pivotal sports moments, most of the time the Nike logo is right there front and center ready to be placed in an ad.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram