Started By
Message

re: Lifeguard Attacked By Trio, Fights Back Fiercely

Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:18 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111147 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Furthermore, your insinuation that because posters did not use pejoratives that have some racial connotations, they must be racist because some posters--who may or may not have posted this in the thread--have used then to describe black indivduals in the past. That itself is a bigoted generalization.
Would you then admit that this must be the world's biggest coincidence because the exact same thing happens in each instance when a thread of each kind is started?

So the only way you're correct is by some strange coincidence.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Would you then admit that this must be the world's biggest coincidence because the exact same thing happens in each instance when a thread of each kind is started?

So the only way you're correct is by some strange coincidence.
I'm not following. I don't deny the racist posts in other threads that use many of the words that he wrote.

I don't fault people for pointing out the comments when they are used with racial undertones; however, tounnecessarily draw attention away from the topic at hand to the LACK of those comments is just hackish in the first place. The major problem though, is that he insinuated that the absence of racist comments was evidence of racism itself. Now I'm sure there are racist posters avoid these types of threads, but he did not make that differentiation. Therefore, it appeared that he was implying that the posters before him must be racist because they didn't say words like "thug." That's unfair and bigoted itself.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram