Started By
Message

re: So, have we established what music streaming service trumps the rest?

Posted on 7/22/15 at 4:54 pm to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61586 posts
Posted on 7/22/15 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

prime is not free


Nobody buys Prime for Music, so if you're using it for that, it is free. Most people buy Prime because the shipping pays for itself. Prime Video is comparable to NetFlix, so even without the shipping benefit you're paying $8.25 for a NetFlix competitor. You wan't to put free in quotes fine, but for people that access Prime Music, they didn't pay for it, it's just a useful (for now) perk.

quote:

plus you can do that with google music for free and they give you 50,000 songs


That 50,000 songs is your own music. That's certainly a nice feature for free, but it's not the same as downloading songs you've never "owned". You have to pay for the ability to download songs, or play songs on demand and without ads LINK Just like all the other music services in the flea market.
This post was edited on 7/22/15 at 4:55 pm
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3663 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 9:28 am to
So....does anyone use the pin or cache feature in google music?

Are there limits/reasons not to?

Our house has no internet service...so this would be a huge advantage.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram