- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which movie was better? Phenomenon (1996) or Powder (1995)
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:30 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:30 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
And both owe a lot to Cameron - Paxton probably a little bit more - everything, really.
I agree...Paxton owes everything to Cameron. Henriksen, on the other hand, should thank Cameron for legitimizing his acting, but Henriksen would've been a great character actor with or without Cameron.
Actually, I think Henriksen is a bit more talented actor than Paxton. Henriksen is certainly more versatile. Make no mistake, Paxton is a very solid who is more popular than Henriksen simply because he is more more marketable to the masses.
This post was edited on 7/15/15 at 10:32 am
1
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:34 am to mizzoukills
quote:
Actually, I think Henriksen is a bit more talented actor than Paxton. Henriksen is certainly more versatile. Make no mistake, Paxton is a very solid who is more popular than Henriksen simply because he is more more marketable to the masses.
Solid analysis - Paxton had more of a leading man's charm and looks, while Henriksen has more of a charactor actor's acting chops - a poor man's Ben Kingsley, for lack of a better description.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News