Started By
Message

re: Gen. Douglas MacArthur "dug out dug"

Posted on 6/16/15 at 3:59 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65053 posts
Posted on 6/16/15 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

If you consider having a higher casualty rate to be awesome, then I'll concede your point. During WWII the Marines suffered a 2.9% KIA rate while the Army suffered a 2.0% KIA rate. For non-lethal wounds the stats are even worse. The Marines suffered slightly over 10.0% casualty rate while the Army's was only slightly over 5.0%.


If we're talking casualty rates then the US Army Air Force's 8th Air Force had the highest casualty rate of any US formation of the war.



LINK
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89777 posts
Posted on 6/16/15 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

If we're talking casualty rates then the US Army Air Force's 8th Air Force had the highest casualty rate of any US formation of the war.



Fair enough - and the submariners also fared poorly in all theaters.

But, those are not directly comparable to ground combat. U.S. Army ground troops suffer fewer casualties than USMC ground troops (all things considered) - and it is a function of operational priorities.
This post was edited on 6/16/15 at 5:48 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram