Started By
Message

re: Gen. Douglas MacArthur "dug out dug"

Posted on 6/16/15 at 11:29 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89777 posts
Posted on 6/16/15 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I would argue that Grant, Washington, Eisenhower, and Patton are better "men-at-arms"


Let's not confuse the generals (who are important, no question) and the real men doing the real fighting.

Audie Murphy is probably the greatest "man-at-arms" we've ever produced - because he so routinely demonstrated courage under fire, I believe his awards are actually understated (despite being the most decorated U.S. soldier of WWII) - he should have received 2 CMH, 1 DSC and 1 SS, as opposed to 1 CMH, 1 DSC and 2 SS - but when we're making that distinction, it's hard to argue against his courage and capability under fire.

Anyone can be brave (and get killed quickly) - anyone can develop some proficiency at arms - very few develop both to the level of success achieved by Murphy, be so effective on the battlefield and live to tell the tale.

Just my $0.02.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17622 posts
Posted on 6/16/15 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Audie Murphy is probably the greatest "man-at-arms" we've ever produced - because he so routinely demonstrated courage under fire, I believe his awards are actually understated (despite being the most decorated U.S. soldier of WWII) - he should have received 2 CMH, 1 DSC and 1 SS, as opposed to 1 CMH, 1 DSC and 2 SS - but when we're making that distinction, it's hard to argue against his courage and capability under fire.


I would most certainly agree with that, sir.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram