- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gen. Douglas MacArthur "dug out dug"
Posted on 6/16/15 at 11:06 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 6/16/15 at 11:06 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Because of the incredible PR arm of the USMC - everyone thinks that every amphibious invasion is all or mostly marines. Try to educate the average American and explain that a single U.S. Army amphibious invasion (Normandy) is about the size of all the USMC invasions in history, combined (possibly excepting Okinawa) and you draw blank stares. Even in the Pacific, there were usually Army units involved in a supporting or reinforcing role (or, in MacArthur's area, as you suggest the sole or main force).
Very true. As for Okinawa, I believe it was an even larger amphibious invasion than Normandy. But even there it was more of an Army than a Marine operation. There were 4 army divisions deployed compared to 3 Marine divisions.
1
Posted on 6/16/15 at 11:18 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
But even there it was more of an Army than a Marine operation. There were 4 army divisions deployed compared to 3 Marine divisions.
Yeah - I don't know the exact order of battle, but that sounds right - and it was all hands on deck for the USMC - that was every marine in the Pacific that was available to put on a landing craft.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News