Started By
Message

re: OT moms, why the reduction in titty feeding?

Posted on 5/25/15 at 9:58 pm to
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4663 posts
Posted on 5/25/15 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Huey-can you offer any reliable sources for that information. It seems rather antiquated and certainly doesn't mesh with the CDC, WHO, or AMA stance.


For the lack of long-term benefits? That comes from this study discussed in the wbur.org article and is among the more recent studies conducted on breastfeeding.

Here's more on the lack of long-term benefits:
Word Health Organization: No Long Term Benefits to Breastfeeding

(referencing this WHO study from 2013 which is a meta analysis of virtually all studies on the long-term effects of breastfeeding: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/79198/1/9789241505307_eng.pdf)

quote:

One study vs thousands that say otherwise...


You seem well-versed on the subject..Show me the thousands of studies as recent as 2013/2014 that contradict the findings of the World Health Organization report or the Colen study.

I used to be a rabid breastfeeding Nazi until the new research started coming in. Lactivists have grossly skewed peoples' perspectives on the matter over the last decade or so. I know women that pour breastmilk that was kept in the freezer for years into their childrens' pinkeye instead of bringing them to the doctor, feed them breastmilk for a flu, dump it on a baby's yeast rash instead of using Clotrimazole, and other really bonkers things. It's just milk, but some people have made it into such a sacred cow that God forbid anyone question whether their magic milk is really a total cure for all childhood ailments.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram