- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mad Men Series Finale - "Person to Person"
Posted on 5/20/15 at 3:47 pm to StringedInstruments
Posted on 5/20/15 at 3:47 pm to StringedInstruments
quote:
Even in science interpretations can change (Kuhn).
So? In the world that Mad Men exists, Weiner is god. His interpretation is reality. You can argue about subjective things like "is Don a good guy" etc. But events like "Did Don create the Coke ad" can only be argued if Weiner himself doesnt know. They can also be argued because Weiner doesnt tell people. But even then, one of those arguments is correct.
Posted on 5/20/15 at 4:06 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
So? In the world that Mad Men exists, Weiner is god. His interpretation is reality. You can argue about subjective things like "is Don a good guy" etc. But events like "Did Don create the Coke ad" can only be argued if Weiner himself doesnt know. They can also be argued because Weiner doesnt tell people. But even then, one of those arguments is correct.
That's not really the case anymore. Weiner could have had Don shoot himself in the head. If someone wanted to argue that there is evidence in the show that Don is the start of the Walking Dead series, they're allowed to.
Obviously that's an extreme example, but that's the nature of analysis nowadays. You're free to interpret what you want, how you want, as long as you provide evidence and citations.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News