Started By
Message

re: James Jones released - "we should"

Posted on 5/4/15 at 1:54 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166503 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 1:54 pm to
having a savy aging vet like robert meachem didn't prove to help shite either. None of the rookies were given a chance last year really.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278756 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 1:59 pm to
quote:


having a savy aging vet like Ben Watson didn't prove to help shite either



FIFY.

dont know why people are counting on him all of a sudden
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24723 posts
Posted on 5/4/15 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

We needed guys last year, especially after Cooks went down



this is a good point that's overlooked. If Cooks goes down, we are really in trouble.


quote:

having a savy aging vet like robert meachem didn't prove to help shite either.



James Jones last 3 seasons >>> Meachem's. Meachem did diddly poo in SD when we brought him back. Jones was still a good player last year on a bad team.

Put it this way. What is the downside of signing him? The upside has been documented in this thread. I have yet to see a downside. The only stance against it is "we love our UDFAs." Ok, if they are that good, they will beat him out for the WR3 spot. Again, no downside there.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram