- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/30/15 at 2:39 pm to jimbeam
quote:
well you said that 99% can be attributed to levees. And that's not correct. So.
If the River had the 1927 levees, would the coast be net eroding or expanding?
If the river had no levees below Belle Chase, would the coast be net eroding or expanding?
If the river had no levees below Venice, would the coast be net eroding or expanding?
The oil companies have certainly made it worse, but none of that would matter if the sediment were making it to the marshes where it belongs. Subsidence in a deltaic system that has been denied annual alluvium can be a real bitch.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News