Started By
Message

re: Daniel Jeremiah projects Amari Cooper to the Giants

Posted on 4/28/15 at 11:22 am to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59130 posts
Posted on 4/28/15 at 11:22 am to
quote:

What frick the are you confused with?


you calling Randle and Cruz pawns? do you know what that word means? It indicates they are being used.

quote:

Randle isn't good. No one knows if Cruz is going to be a stud WR again.


why didn't you say that instead of misuing the word pawns?

In any event, Randle caugt 71 balls for for 938 last year including 132 and 158 in the last 2 games. since he's still on his rookie deal making right around $1M this year, seems like value for that production, I'd take him as a #2 or 3 WR especially if i had a budding super star at 1 of my other WR spots and a 29th ranked D as opposed to taking another WR that would cost a lot more.
This post was edited on 4/28/15 at 11:24 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166482 posts
Posted on 4/28/15 at 11:23 am to
Cooper would be great value hard to pass up. realistically they probably need to improve their O line but Cooper would be hard to argue with value wise.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 4/28/15 at 11:29 am to
I used pawn in the sense of "not that good" / "not valuable" / "expendable", you know, because a pawn is all of those things.

Didn't think it would throw you for a loop. If it did, I sincerely apologize.

Little testy, are we?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram