- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ring Magazine ranking of best boxers since World War II
Posted on 4/24/15 at 4:21 pm to Amadeo
Posted on 4/24/15 at 4:21 pm to Amadeo
quote:
And usually by the same people who claim that Marciano fought bums.
Usually by the people who know a lot more about boxing it seems..
No knock against Marciano as he beat who was available 1952-55 during his short 3 year reign(only 5 title defenses) & retiring at 32(Only young Liston & Patterson loomed ).
In perspective Marciano (1956) beat a 42 year old Archie Moore who actually floored Rocky early on in the fight. Charles beat a prime Moore 3 times in the late 40's.
Jersey Joe Walcott was 38 & 39 when he lost after flooring /dominating the 1st fight before 1 punch took him out.. (Charles beat a younger Prime Walcott twice before he became a near shot fighter by 1951 losing twice to Jersey Joe)
Ezzard Charles (33) lost a 15 rd decision & KO rematch 3 years after he was considered near shot after failing to to beat Walcott whom he dominated twice as a younger fighter.
Joe Louis worth mentioning at 37? Ezzard Charles completely schooled a 36 year old Louis a year earlier.
Marciano retired at 32 after 5 defenses & his best opponents past their primes.
Ezzard Charles nearly clearing out 3 divisions(MW/LHW & HW) despite missing 2 peak years to WWII is not up for dispute with serious boxing fans.
Find someone else to take issue with besides Charles if you want to seriously discuss boxing.
Posted on 4/24/15 at 4:33 pm to sugar71
arguello and Hagler should have been higher. No Chuck Wepner?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News