- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trade Costs
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:50 am to Screaming Viking
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:50 am to Screaming Viking
quote:
Example, didn't Seattle say one of the reasons that they had no issue trading their #1 pick to the Saints this year was that they only had given 16 players a true first round grade.
I didn't see that anywhere, but its very possible. If their 1st round basically finishes after pick 16, then 31 wasn't very useful to them. Where as for New Orleans, the 31st is a hot commodity (IMO). I think they absolutely need to keep, at least, 4 of the 5 picks they currently have in the top 78.
1
Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:23 am to SaintEB
#31 vs. 2nd Rd has the extra year contract advantage to consider also
I'm witcha adono. I'm an advocate of moving back and getting more picks almost always. Just facing the reality of history with Loomis.
I listed all the Saints draft pick trades since 2006.QUESTION- Has Loomis ever traded back?
I'm witcha adono. I'm an advocate of moving back and getting more picks almost always. Just facing the reality of history with Loomis.
I listed all the Saints draft pick trades since 2006.QUESTION- Has Loomis ever traded back?
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 11:30 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News