- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trade Costs
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:29 am to Meateye
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:29 am to Meateye
I think the reason this may seem "wrong" to some is that it has to do with the perceived value by the team initiating the trade of the person they are chasing. This chart is simply a starting point for negotiations.
Example, didn't Seattle say one of the reasons that they had no issue trading their #1 pick to the Saints this year was that they only had given 16 players a true first round grade.
Example, didn't Seattle say one of the reasons that they had no issue trading their #1 pick to the Saints this year was that they only had given 16 players a true first round grade.
1
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:50 am to Screaming Viking
quote:
Example, didn't Seattle say one of the reasons that they had no issue trading their #1 pick to the Saints this year was that they only had given 16 players a true first round grade.
I didn't see that anywhere, but its very possible. If their 1st round basically finishes after pick 16, then 31 wasn't very useful to them. Where as for New Orleans, the 31st is a hot commodity (IMO). I think they absolutely need to keep, at least, 4 of the 5 picks they currently have in the top 78.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News