- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trade Costs
Posted on 4/23/15 at 9:34 am to blueslover
Posted on 4/23/15 at 9:34 am to blueslover
all theoretically speaking
2
Posted on 4/23/15 at 9:40 am to Chad504boy
quote:
all theoretically speaking
exactly. that chart is based off of Bill Parcells from 10yrs+ ago. things are much different now and that chart isn't as relevant anymore. sometimes more is required and other times less. I wonder how many if any teams even refer to this, or is it just the media and fans
Posted on 4/23/15 at 9:53 am to Chad504boy
Review NFL trades and you will see the draft pick chart values are still adhered to by and large. Ex: Cooks trade last year, #27 + #91 (816pts) for #20 (850pts)
Two 3rds is prolly already burning a hole in Loomis' pocket.
I don't see a lot for #13. That would be to the Giants spot. The three spots you jump (StL, Min, CLE) don't look to be huge competitors for positions.
If guessing, I'd predict they move up from #31. It could be a considerable difference in what target is on the board at #21 vs. #31
Two 3rds is prolly already burning a hole in Loomis' pocket.
I don't see a lot for #13. That would be to the Giants spot. The three spots you jump (StL, Min, CLE) don't look to be huge competitors for positions.
If guessing, I'd predict they move up from #31. It could be a considerable difference in what target is on the board at #21 vs. #31
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News