- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Battlefront won't have single player story...
Posted on 4/22/15 at 5:23 pm to Scruffy
Posted on 4/22/15 at 5:23 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Maybe someone can explain to me why these games, which are more expensive than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50, have less content than their predecessors by magnitudes of 50.
We keep paying for them.
Pretty simple really. When DLCs started costing money and people started paying it.
Game companies started lining their pockets.
I remember the old RPG games use to have 80 plus hours worth of material.
Now many consider 20 this great thing.
You want to change the game industry, stop buying half finished games.
No one will so this sort of thing will continue.
Posted on 4/22/15 at 5:39 pm to asurob1
I never understood the obsession with game length. Some games don't need to be long. Last of us was amazing and under 20 hours.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 12:22 am to asurob1
quote:
I remember the old RPG games use to have 80 plus hours worth of material.
Now many consider 20 this great thing.
Yeah, I know right. Those RPG like Dragon Age and Bloodborne. They're just really lacking for content.
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 12:23 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News