Started By
Message

re: Bizarre Math Question and Answer breaks the internet - Sorry if already posted

Posted on 4/16/15 at 8:01 am to
Posted by snoggerT
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
755 posts
Posted on 4/16/15 at 8:01 am to
quote:

But the problem as written, not as an engineer would interpet it is 288. There is a reason that R and other math software result in 288 because as written, without any assumptions, the answer is 288. If you want the answer to result in 2, you need to add parantheses.


- Then go input the following equation exactly how you read it:

48
2(9+3)

you would get 288 in any math program if you just read it as is (48 divided by 2(9+3)) without using any logic.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 4/16/15 at 8:09 am to
quote:

- Then go input the following equation exactly how you read it:

48
2(9+3)

you would get 288 in any math program if you just read it as is (48 divided by 2(9+3)) without using any logic.
That's not how it's written though, given the limitation of the symtax. It would have to be written like (2(9+3)).
This post was edited on 4/16/15 at 8:12 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram