- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff- how old is too old to wear cargo shorts?
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:19 pm to dnm3305
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:19 pm to dnm3305
quote:Yeah man, these guys aren't masculine at all
Slight exaggeration, but you cant tell me that you wears these and honestly feel masculine. The "frat" shorts were never intended for men to wear and it's a travesty that theyve been introduced.
. 
Shorts didn't became popular in America until after WWII, and they certainly didn't go below the knee back then.
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 2:22 pm
1
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:24 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Yeah man, these guys aren't masculine at all
I honestly do even know if I should reply because of how asinine this post is, but here goes...
In the first picture, 10-11" shorts werent even invented yet, and I cant believe I actually have to spell this out for you, but there's a difference between going on a combat mission (shorts would be incredibly stupid in a climate like that, but that's a tangent point) and going to a backyard bbq with some pastel 5" chinos. They are not the same thing.
The bottom picture is irrelevant because those are at least 8-9" inseams which is not what's being discussed.
quote:
they certainly didn't go below the knee back then
In what world does sitting an inch above the knee, what I actaully said, really mean sitting below the knee? Please explain.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News