Started By
Message

re: Penile plethysmograph for Darren Sharper

Posted on 4/10/15 at 6:47 am to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 4/10/15 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Sharper will be subject to lie detector tests and, while on lifetime probation in Arizona, to the “penile plethysmograph,” in which a sensor is attached to the penis while an array of sexual images flashes before his eyes, to gauge arousal.
He's a bad person and deserves whatever punishment possible, but this just sounds like a questionable idea. I may be caught up in the "lie-detector part, but is there any scientific evidence that this has any value? More importantly, do you actually have a link that they are planning to do this?
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 6:50 am
Posted by Mckinley9293
Out of the Womb
Member since Apr 2015
85 posts
Posted on 4/10/15 at 6:50 am to
‘Penile plethysmograph’ test to gauge arousal part of Darren Sharper’s strict post-prison deal LINK
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18928 posts
Posted on 4/10/15 at 7:11 am to
You are right about the lie detector. It is absolutely junk science that has no reasonable basis in fact. It only measures how much you "care" about your answer. The irony being that a truly crazy frick that DGAF can pass with flying colors while.a completely honest person who knows the machine is shite can answer honestly but show as deceptive because he worries about the outcome. Polygraphers are trained to literally swear under oath that they can tell the difference and the machines work blah, blah, blah. But get an honest one in a bar, as I have done, and they will tell you the truth.

And before someone comes up with some obscure internet link disputing this, I have taken dozens of polys for security clearances over my career and know of what I speak. I dreaded every one and won't ever get hooked to a box again.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12977 posts
Posted on 4/10/15 at 7:58 am to
quote:

He's a bad person and deserves whatever punishment possible, but this just sounds like a questionable idea. I may be caught up in the "lie-detector part, but is there any scientific evidence that this has any value? More importantly, do you actually have a link that they are planning to do this?


It's a common therapeutic tool for sex offenders. It's used in treatment to confront pervs when they are in denial, but will rarely be used in court for criminal charges.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram