Started By
Message

re: NCAA Graphic: New Ball vs. Old Ball Comparison

Posted on 4/1/15 at 1:26 pm to
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43462 posts
Posted on 4/1/15 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

You use small numbers to prove a point... good job.

Let's use big numbers as an example then... say it goes 1000 HRs to 1390 HRs.

See what I did there?


I'm using numbers that people can understand... Do you think .7 homeruns is good for the sport? Simple question. If so, then the balls did their job.

In the Majors they hit 1.7 homeruns per game. That is a reasonable expectation IMO for parks that are a lot smaller than MLB parks (on average).

Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85091 posts
Posted on 4/1/15 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

That is a reasonable expectation IMO for parks that are a lot smaller than MLB parks (on average).
With MLB, you are averaging the best of the best and only 32 teams... With college, you are averaging hundreds of teams most of whom have players that aren't great. It's not fair at all to compare the two.
This post was edited on 4/1/15 at 1:28 pm
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61834 posts
Posted on 4/1/15 at 2:42 pm to
quote:


In the Majors they hit 1.7 homeruns per game. That is a reasonable expectation IMO for parks that are a lot smaller than MLB parks (on average).

Right, except that the hr/game in the ncaa has never been remotely close to 1.7.

The highest it's been since 1970 has been 1.06 and that was in the gorilla ball days of 1998. Early 90s and early to mid 2000s had rates around 0.7-0.8, which is where I think it needs to be.

Here's some trend stats for perspective. LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram