- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jay Z's New Streaming Service's Keynote: Biggest Douche or Surreal Skit Show?
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:11 am to Dijkstra
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:11 am to Dijkstra
quote:
Whether you like the people or not, TIDAL does offer a higher quality. That is not something anyone can debate. Its's been out for quite some time, and the reviews are pretty good. CD quality music through a streaming service is pretty impressive if it actually works.
What bit rate is the high quality music?
How is that going to affect mobile data plans?
Blind testing shows that people can't discern between 256 kbps and lossless audio.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:22 am to colorchangintiger
Most services (such as Spotify) use 320kbps. TIDAL HiFi streams at 1411kbps. They also offer a service at the same quality as Spotify at $9.99.
That's largely dependent on the audio being listened to and the hardware being used. To the trained ear, there's a difference, but you're right that most people won't hear the difference. There's less being knocked off of the track itself, though, and to the audiophile with high end headphones, there's a difference. You're hearing the track as it was intended to be heard with a fuller range of highs, lows, and whatever else may be lost in Vorbis schemes.
To be clear, I'm not claiming to be a trained ear or audiophile, but I do believe that we shouldn't just settle on a low bitrate and not ever progress just because people don't think they need it. A lot of people claimed they didn't see any difference between HD and standard definition television, and they didn't need it. If we can get FLAC/ALAC streaming as the norm, it's a plus.
quote:
Blind testing shows that people can't discern between 256 kbps and lossless audio.
That's largely dependent on the audio being listened to and the hardware being used. To the trained ear, there's a difference, but you're right that most people won't hear the difference. There's less being knocked off of the track itself, though, and to the audiophile with high end headphones, there's a difference. You're hearing the track as it was intended to be heard with a fuller range of highs, lows, and whatever else may be lost in Vorbis schemes.
To be clear, I'm not claiming to be a trained ear or audiophile, but I do believe that we shouldn't just settle on a low bitrate and not ever progress just because people don't think they need it. A lot of people claimed they didn't see any difference between HD and standard definition television, and they didn't need it. If we can get FLAC/ALAC streaming as the norm, it's a plus.
This post was edited on 3/31/15 at 9:25 am
Posted on 4/23/15 at 6:17 pm to colorchangintiger
quote:
How is that going to affect mobile data plans?
I saw a video breaking down what Tidal has to offer and according to that (FWIW) the average mobile data plan can handle 1-2 albums a month and then you're over.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News