- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "A-list" actors- Office Arguement.
Posted on 3/17/15 at 10:32 pm to Upperdecker
Posted on 3/17/15 at 10:32 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
A List is determined by whether you can be a headline in a higher budget movie.
quote:
Also I'd argue you don't lose A list status.
Burt Reynolds was an A lister in the 70s and could headline big budget movies. Is he an A lister now? Same goes for Travolta, Willis, Deniro, and a few others on that list.
2
Posted on 3/17/15 at 10:44 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Burt Reynolds was an A lister in the 70s and could headline big budget movies. Is he an A lister now? Same goes for Travolta, Willis, Deniro, and a few others on that list.
Travolta took a few years off but has a ton of new stuff coming out. Deniro was in American Hustle and has a bunch of movies coming out. Willis was recently in the last Expendables, GI JOE 2 and a few other movies that made 100+ million. I am not saying they are still good actors but in the right movie all 3 can put butts in the seats and make 100+ million dollar movies....which IMO makes them A listers.
Posted on 3/17/15 at 11:01 pm to Brosef Stalin
Maybe Burt shouldn't have been considered an A lister then. No other ones have lost their status. Expendable is a great example
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News