Started By
Message

re: Legal challenge to FFP moving along

Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:23 am to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84895 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Difference they got their kick start and changed their ways. City and PSG have no intentions of doing so.


So are you saying you'd be okay with an initial large outlay of funds to kick start a club and build a fanbase/extra revenue streams?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125485 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:26 am to
quote:

So are you saying you'd be okay with an initial large outlay of funds to kick start a club and build a fanbase/extra revenue streams?



I don't think anyone has an issue with a injection of cash into clubs. The issue is the continued reckless spending.

In terms of building extra fan base. Thats not really going to happen and City is a perfect example. Due to the tribalistic nature of european soccer.

Extra revenue streams, you mean shady over inflated sponsorship deals. No way you can say with a straight face the naming rights to City's stadium is worth 350 million pounds.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 9:28 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram