- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legal challenge to FFP moving along
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:40 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:40 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
QPR didn't, I'm sure there are others. And besides, I already told you why: protectionism or to give a frugal owner an excuse for supporters as to why they can't move forward.
lol QPR just posted a loss of only around 10 million pounds.
Thats peanuts in world football. They clearly are figuring it out.
quote:
Where would Chelsea be if FFP had been in place 15 years ago? They'd still be a mid table side with little hope of ever breaking into the upper echelon, and the BPL would be a less interesting place for that. Sure, that would be good for Manchester United, more trophies for you, but it would be bad for the league. There has to be some modicum of uncertainty and hope for a club that they too can one day be a top side. You've taken that away from most supporters.
You can protect clubs from excessive debt and still allow for owners to spend their own money to improve their positions but that's not what FFP was ever about.
You act as if Chelsea wasn't successful right before the were bought
They were a club on the rise
Get your protecting the top dogs conspiracy out of here.
1
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:46 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
You act as if Chelsea wasn't successful right before the were bought
Hadn't won the league in 50 years, only a small handful of top 4 finishes in that time. You're really going to try to say with a straight face they would be where there are now if FFP were instituted in say, 1999?
quote:
Get your protecting the top dogs conspiracy out of here.
If that's not what it is then tell me why they didn't stop at just limiting debts? Why shouldn't owners be able to spend their own cash to improve their clubs?
quote:
lol QPR just posted a loss of only around 10 million pounds.
You said PSG and City were the only 2 clubs against FFP, I proved you wrong.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 8:52 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News