- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legal challenge to FFP moving along
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:49 am to EastNastySwag
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:49 am to EastNastySwag
Nobody has a problem with a rule preventing an owner from saddling a club with a huge amount of debt.
But there is no legitimate reason for preventing an owner from using cash to improve their squad, other than to protect the top clubs and give more frugal owners an excuse to justify their lack of investment. That's the issue and it's mind boggling why any intellectually honest person would support this aspect of the rule.
But there is no legitimate reason for preventing an owner from using cash to improve their squad, other than to protect the top clubs and give more frugal owners an excuse to justify their lack of investment. That's the issue and it's mind boggling why any intellectually honest person would support this aspect of the rule.
1
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:58 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
But there is no legitimate reason for preventing an owner from using cash to improve their squad, other than to protect the top clubs and give more frugal owners an excuse to justify their lack of investment. That's the issue and it's mind boggling why any intellectually honest person would support this aspect of the rule.
Then why was FFP voted yes by every club other than City and PSG
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News