Started By
Message

re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?

Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:32 pm to
Posted by gene_parmesan
Member since Jan 2014
247 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:32 pm to
are you really this dense? because I think youre fricking with me at this point.


the defense was on the field because the offense turned it over. if the defense is having to be on the field because the offense turns it over, then the defense becomes tired. you say "don't give you the D tired", but I don't know how this isn't so obvious. If the offense doesn't turn it over, they continue to hold onto it, thereby increasing TOP in their favor, and still have the chance to turn those into points. iirc all 3 of the picks were in scoring range. thats at least 9 points off the board. LSU lost by 3.

like I said, this isn't that hard.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71848 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

the defense was on the field because the offense turned it over. if the defense is having to be on the field because the offense turns it over, then the defense becomes tired. you say "don't give you the D tired", but I don't know how this isn't so obvious

Two of those drives combined to go 14 plays and 5 minutes total. If the D gets the 3 and out they should have on OM's game winning drive TOP likely ends up 30/30.
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 9:41 pm
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

like I said, this isn't that hard.


it's isn't that hard, go dig into the drive chart for that game and you'll see that you're largely wrong on the "tired" angle.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram